_DVD_Copy_Control_Ass'n,_Inc._ v. _McLaughlin,_ No. CV 786804, 2000 WL 48512 (Cal.
Superior, January 21, 2000).

[11-23] See Michael A. Geist, "iCraveTV and the New Rules of Internet Broadcasting,"
_University_of_Arkansas_at_Little_Rock_Law_Review_ 23 (2000): 223; and John Borland, "On-
line TV Service May Spark New Net Battle," CNET.com, at http://news.cnet.com/
news/0-1004-200-1477491.html (last visited April 4, 2001) (describing the launch of the
iCraveTV.com Web site). For a scholarly analysis of the case, see Howard P. Knopf,
"Copyright and the Internet in Canada and Beyond: Convergence, Vision and Divi-
sion," _European_Intellectual_Property_Review_ (2000): 262.

[11-24] China Online (visited April 17, 2001), http://www.chinaonline.com (a U.S.-based
English-language news site on China). Or alternatively, Human Rights in China (visited
April 17, 2001), http://www.hrichina.org (a New York-based Chinese/English-language
Web site chronicling Chinese human rights abuses).

[11-25] See _Association_"Union_des_Etudiants_Juifs_de_France",_la_"Ligue_contre_le_Racisme_
_et_l'Antisemitisme"_ v. _Yahoo!_Inc._et_Yahoo_France,_ T.G.I. Paris, Ordonnance de refere
du 22 mai 2000, available at: http://www.legalis.net/jnet/decisions/responsabilite/
ord_tgi-paris_220500.htm.

[11-26] See Jack L. Goldsmith and Alan O. Sykes, "The Internet and the Dormant Com-
merce Clause," _Yale_Law_Journal_ 110 (2001): 785. See also Lawrence Lessig and Paul
Resnick, "Zoning Speech on the Internet: A Legal and Technical Model," _Michigan_
_Law_Review_ 98 (1999): 395

[11-27] A very similar point is made by Denise Caruso. See "Case Illustrates Entertainment
Industry's Copyright Power," _New_York_Times,_ March 13, 2000, available at http://www.
nytimes.com/library/tech/00/03/biztech/articles/13digi.html. As Caruso writes, "The
most chilling aspect of the case... was [iCraveTV's] response. That is, [it] did not argue
the legality of the action against [it], but instead responded by inventing a technology
that could stop the discussion dead in its tracks." Caruso continues: "Many people are
likely to object strongly to [the site's] balkanized Internet... such a system would de-
volve the Internet into a model very much like the restricted, centralized control of cable
television. That is a business model with which the $65 billion media and entertainment
industries -- the very ones that nearly sued the pants off [of the site] -- are quite familiar."
Ibid.

[11-28] See Press Release, Recording Industry Association of America, RIAA Statement
Concerning MP3.Com's New Services, January 21, 2000, at http://www.riaa.com/
PR_Story.cfm?id=47.

[11-29] The court's ruling in the case determines that the damages are $25,000 per CD.
This leads to possible damages of $118 million if the total is determined to be at least
4,700 CDs. _UMG_Recordings,_Inc._ v. _MP3.Com,_Inc._, No. 00 CIV. 472(JSR), 2000 WL
1262568, at *6 (S.D.N.Y., 2000).

[11-30] See, e.g., Amy Harmon, "Powerful Music Software Has Industry Worried," _New_York_
_Times,_ March 7, 2000, available at http://www.nytimes.com/library/tech/00/03/biztech/
articles/07net.html; Karl Taro Greenfeld, "The Free Juke Box," _Time_ (March 27, 2000),
available at http://www.time.com/time/everyone/magazine/sidebar_napster.html; Andy
Oram, "Gnutella and Freenet Represent True Technological Innovation," May 12, 2000,
at http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/network/2000/05/12/magazine/gnutella.html; also
_Peer-to-Peer:_Harnessing_the_Benefits_of_a_Disruptive_Technology,_ Andy Oram, ed. (Beijing
and Cambridge, Mass.: O'Reilly, 2000).

[11-31] Home Recording of Copyrighted Works: Hearing on H.R. 4783, H.R. 4794, H.R.
4808, H.R. 5250, H.R. 5488, and H.R. 5750 Before the Subcomm. on Courts, Civil Lib-

[[313]]

p312 _ -chap- _ toc-1 _ p313w _ toc-2 _ +chap+ _ p314

v?